Appearance
Competitive Intel Digest
Build an agent that researches competitor activity across the web every week, compiles findings into a structured analysis, and highlights pricing changes, product launches, and hiring trends.
The Business Problem
Your strategy team monitors 5-8 competitors, but the process is inconsistent. Someone reads an article here, catches a LinkedIn post there, and the findings live in scattered Slack messages. By the time a quarterly review rolls around, nobody has a complete picture.
You need a systematic, repeatable process that delivers a structured digest every week without anyone manually Googling competitor names.
What You'll Build
| Component | Details |
|---|---|
| Agent | Market Analyst |
| Workflow | 4-step competitive research workflow |
| Guidelines | 3 rules for focus areas, sourcing, and positioning |
| Connections | Brave Search |
| Output | Competitive digest artifact |
Step 1: Set Up Connections
This workflow only needs one connection because it relies on web search and page fetching.
Brave Search
- Go to Connections in the sidebar and click Add Connection.
- Select Brave Search.
- Enter your Brave Search API key.
- Click Connect and verify the status.
TIP
Brave Search is the most cost-effective option for web research workflows. You get generous API limits and results aren't filtered through ad-ranking algorithms.
Step 2: Create the Agent
Go to Agents and click New Agent.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Name | Market Analyst |
| Description | Researches competitor activity and compiles weekly competitive intelligence digests |
| Preferred Model | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| Risk Tolerance | High |
For the agent's Role Instructions, use:
You are a market analyst specializing in competitive intelligence. You write structured, analytical reports backed by cited sources. You focus on facts and observable signals rather than speculation. When drawing comparisons, always reference specific data points.
INFO
Gemini 2.5 Flash is chosen here because competitive research involves processing many search results and web pages. Flash is fast and cost-effective for high-volume reading and summarization. The analysis quality is excellent for research tasks.
Why high risk tolerance? This workflow only reads and analyzes public information. There's no sensitive data or customer-facing output, so the agent can work quickly without extra safety checks.
Step 3: Add Guidelines
Create three guidelines and assign them to the Market Analyst agent.
Guideline 1: Focus Areas
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Name | Focus on pricing changes, product launches, and hiring trends |
| Content | Prioritize three categories of competitive signals: (1) Pricing changes — new plans, price increases/decreases, packaging changes, free tier modifications. (2) Product launches — new features, new products, major updates, beta programs. (3) Hiring trends — key executive hires, layoffs, job posting volumes by department, new office locations. If a competitor has no activity in a category, say so explicitly. |
| Activation | Always active |
Guideline 2: Source Citations
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Name | Cite all sources with URLs |
| Content | Every factual claim must include a source URL. Format citations as inline links. If a finding comes from multiple sources, include all of them. Never make claims without a source. If you cannot verify a rumor or speculation, label it clearly as "Unverified" and include the original source. |
| Activation | Always active |
Guideline 3: Competitive Positioning
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Name | Compare to our position on each finding |
| Content | For every significant competitor finding, add a "Our Position" note comparing how we stack up. Be honest and specific. Examples: "We launched a similar feature in Q4 — adoption data not yet available" or "Our pricing is 20% higher for the equivalent tier" or "We do not currently offer this capability." |
| Activation | Always active |
Step 4: Build the Workflow
Go to Workflows and click New Workflow.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Name | Competitive Intel Digest |
| Description | Weekly competitive intelligence research and analysis |
| Default Agent | Market Analyst |
| Schedule | Every Friday at 2:00 PM |
Step 1: Search for Competitor News
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Type | Action |
| Instructions | Search for recent news and updates about each competitor: [Competitor A], [Competitor B], [Competitor C], [Competitor D], [Competitor E]. For each competitor, search for: (1) "[Company] pricing" OR "[Company] pricing change", (2) "[Company] product launch" OR "[Company] new feature", (3) "[Company] hiring" OR "[Company] layoffs". Compile a list of the most relevant URLs found. |
| Auto-Approve | Yes |
Step 2: Fetch and Read Key Pages
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Type | Action |
| Instructions | From the URLs found in Step 1, fetch and read the top 3-5 most relevant pages per competitor. Focus on primary sources (company blogs, press releases, official announcements) over secondary coverage. Extract the key facts from each page. |
| Auto-Approve | Yes |
Step 3: Analyze and Compare
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Type | Action |
| Instructions | Analyze all findings and organize them by competitor. For each competitor, categorize signals into Pricing, Product, and Hiring. Score the overall competitive threat level as Low / Medium / High based on the volume and significance of activity. Identify the single most important competitive development of the week. |
| Auto-Approve | Yes |
Step 4: Create Competitive Digest
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Type | Action |
| Instructions | Create a structured competitive digest artifact with these sections: (1) Executive Summary — the top 3 things leadership should know, (2) Per-Competitor Breakdown — organized by company, with subsections for Pricing, Product, and Hiring, each including citations and our positioning, (3) Threat Assessment — table ranking competitors by activity level this week, (4) Recommended Actions — 2-3 things our team should consider in response. |
| Auto-Approve | Yes |
TIP
All steps have Auto-Approve enabled because this is a research-only workflow with no external actions (no posting, no sending messages, no modifying data). The worst case is a report you don't use.
Step 5: Run and Review
The workflow runs automatically every Friday at 2 PM. You can also trigger it manually anytime:
- Open the workflow and click Run.
- Watch progress on the Jobs page (
/jobs). All four steps auto-approve. - When complete, find the digest in Artifacts.
Expected Output
Artifact: "Competitive Intel Digest — Week of [Date]"
A structured report like this:
Executive Summary
- Competitor A launched a free tier targeting SMBs — directly competes with our Starter plan
- Competitor C raised enterprise pricing by 15%, creating an opportunity for us
- Competitor B posted 12 new engineering roles, suggesting a major product push
Competitor A — ThreatLevel: High
Pricing Launched a free tier with 1,000 API calls/month (source). Previously their lowest plan was $49/mo. Our Position: Our Starter plan is $29/mo with 5,000 calls. We don't have a free tier.
Product No significant launches this week.
Hiring Posted 3 sales roles in EMEA (source), signaling European expansion. Our Position: We have no current EMEA presence.
...
Threat Assessment
Competitor Activity Level Key Signal Competitor A High Free tier launch Competitor C Medium Price increase Competitor B Medium Hiring surge Competitor D Low No significant activity Competitor E Low Blog post only Recommended Actions
- Evaluate whether to introduce a free tier in response to Competitor A (owner: Product)
- Target Competitor C's enterprise customers with competitive pricing offers (owner: Sales)
- Monitor Competitor B's engineering postings for hints about upcoming features (owner: Strategy)
Cost Considerations
This workflow uses Gemini 2.5 Flash, which makes it one of the most cost-effective workflows you can run.
| Step | Estimated Tokens | Approximate Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Step 1: Search | ~1,000 | Minimal |
| Step 2: Fetch pages | ~5,000 | Minimal |
| Step 3: Analysis | ~3,000 | Minimal |
| Step 4: Digest | ~4,000 | Minimal |
A typical weekly run costs a fraction of what a Claude-based workflow would cost. Check the run's cost view on the Jobs page for exact numbers.
INFO
If you want higher-quality analysis in the final digest, you can assign Step 4 to a different agent that uses Claude, while keeping Steps 1-3 on Gemini Flash. Create a second agent called "Strategy Writer" with Claude as the preferred model, then override the agent for Step 4 only.
Customization Ideas
- Add more competitors. Update Step 1's instructions with additional company names.
- Change the focus areas. Edit the "Focus Areas" guideline to track different signals (e.g., partnerships, regulatory filings, patent activity).
- Increase frequency. Change the schedule to daily for fast-moving markets.
- Add Slack distribution. Add a Step 5 that posts the executive summary to a Slack channel (requires a Slack connection).
Troubleshooting
| Problem | Solution |
|---|---|
| Search returns irrelevant results | Make competitor names more specific in the instructions. Add "Inc." or the product name to disambiguate. |
| Pages fail to fetch | Some sites block automated access. The agent will note which pages it couldn't read. Consider those sources manually. |
| Digest is too long | Add a word limit to the Step 4 instructions (e.g., "Keep the total digest under 2,000 words"). |
| Analysis seems shallow | Switch the Analysis step (Step 3) to Claude for deeper reasoning, or add more specific prompts about what to look for. |
